top of page

Rebrand Examples: Crocs, SKIMS & Diesel (And When You Really Need a Rebrand)

  • Writer: Chantelle.F
    Chantelle.F
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • 5 min read

Sometimes a new logo or cleaner visuals are enough. Sometimes… the brand you started with just doesn’t fit anymore.


A rebrand isn’t about being bored of your logo. It’s a strategic shift in who the brand is for, what it stands for, and how it’s understood.

Quick check: How to know if a brand needs a "rebrand".

  • Has your audience levelled up, but your brand still talks to who you were a few years ago?

  • Are your prices and product quality higher now, while your brand still looks entry-level or DIY?

  • Do people keep misunderstanding what you do or putting you in the wrong box, even after seeing your site or socials?

  • Are you making a big shift (new category, new market, new model) and your current brand just doesn’t stretch that far?

  • Has your brand picked up baggage or a bad rep (old drama, dated associations, the wrong crowd) that you don’t want to carry into the next phase?

  • Do you feel like a completely different brand on the inside to what shows up online—even after trying small tweaks?


Below are three strong rebrand examples Crocs, SKIMS and Diesel — and what they reveal about when a brand truly needs to change course.


  1. Crocs: From “Ugly Joke” to Fashion-Adjacent Cult Brand

Before the rebrand (perception problem)

Crocs in 2000s that was "ugly" and unpopular.

Crocs launched as practical foam clogs: comfortable, waterproof… and widely mocked.

For years, the brand was associated with:

  • “Ugly but comfy”

  • Functional professions (chefs, nurses, gardeners)

  • Internet jokes before meme culture was mainstream

The product worked.The meaning attached to it didn’t.

Crocs wasn’t failing — but it was boxed into a cultural punchline.


What changed?

Crocs didn’t redesign the shoe. The rebrand happened at a positioning and cultural level.

Crocs clogs styled as a fashion statement, reflecting the brand’s rebrand from functional footwear to cultural icon.

They leaned into the problem instead of fixing it

  • Owning the “ugly” narrative instead of defending against it

  • Reframing Crocs as expressive, ironic and customisable


Crocs rebranded and collab with celebrity Justin Bieber, wearing crocs "ugly crocs" on the red carpet.

They used collaboration as repositioning

  • Fashion and designer collabs

  • Pop culture and unexpected partnerships

  • Limited drops that created desire, not just utility


After Croc's rebrand, the brand worked with Justin Bieber for a collection, showcasing lavender colour crocs.

They rebuilt the campaign world

  • Bolder styling and unexpected contexts

  • Fashion, streetwear and music visuals

  • A clear visual language around personalisation (Jibbitz)

The logo stayed.The shoe stayed. The story changed.


After the rebrand: what actually changed

  • Crocs introduced a new brand strategy around 2017. By 2023, revenue hit about $3 billion, roughly three times the level before that relaunch.

  • Looking at the longer run: Crocs’ revenue was around $1.0B in 2017 and grew to roughly $4.1B by 2024 – about 4x growth in seven years.

  • From 2019 to 2021, revenue doubled, and net profit increased five-fold; the stock price rose about 16x from its 2020 low to its 2021 peak.

That growth isn’t only from branding (product, operations and the pandemic comfort-shoe boom helped too), but it shows that the shift from “ugly clog joke” to self-aware, collab-driven cult brand translated into real demand and pricing power, not just social media chatter.



Who they’re talking to now

  • Gen Z and young millennials

  • Fashion and streetwear audiences

  • People who want comfort and a statement

Same clogs. Entirely new context.


2. SKIMS: From Naming Controversy to “Solution wear” Brand

Before the rebrand

Kim Kardashian’s shapewear brand originally launched as “Kimono”.

The idea was strong:

  • Shapewear solving real wardrobe problems

  • Nude tones for multiple skin colours

  • A founder deeply involved in the product

But the name caused immediate backlash and overshadowed everything else.

The issue wasn’t the product. It was the brand wrapper.


What changed

Kim Kardashian Skims Pop Up Event

The rebrand to SKIMS was decisive and strategic.

A new name with a clearer story

  • “SKIMS” suggests second skin and function

  • Clean break from cultural controversy


Skim's shapewear campaign, showcasing a range of body types and diversity.

Clearer positioning

  • “Solution wear,” not just shapewear

  • Everyday basics, loungewear and underwear


A refined brand world

  • Neutral, skin-inspired palettes

  • Consistent imagery across site, socials and packaging

  • Inclusivity without over-explaining

Founder credibility

  • Kim visibly uses and explains the products

  • The brand feels built from lived experience, not celebrity endorsement


After the rebrand: what actually changed

  • SKIMS launched in 2019; by 2020 it was already doing about $145M in revenue. By 2023, analysts were estimating $750M–$1B – more than 5x growth in roughly three years.

  • One data provider pegs SKIMS at around $750M revenue in 2023 and a $4B valuation at that time.

  • In 2025, SKIMS raised a new round led by Goldman Sachs at a $5B valuation, with the company saying it was on track to exceed $1B in net sales in 2025. That valuation is now higher than the combined market caps of Victoria’s Secret and Under Armour.

Again, that’s product + operations + Kardashian machine, not just a new name. But the pivot from Kimono to SKIMS with a clearer “solutionwear” story gave the brand a platform that investors, press and customers could actually get behind – and scale.



Skims review on youtube from a plus size user.

Who they’re talking to now

  • People who want basics that actually work

  • Shoppers who care about fit, tone range and comfort

  • Customers who trust founder-led problem solving

This is a rebrand driven by clarity, not just damage control.



3. Diesel: A New Creative Era, and Becoming Relevant Again

Before the rebrand

Diesel 1990s controversy campaign.

Diesel was iconic in the 90s and early 2000s but also controversy. Over time, it started to feel:

  • Less present in fashion conversations

  • Overshadowed by newer luxury and streetwear brands

  • Anchored to an outdated idea of rebellion

The brand history was strong.The relevance wasn’t.


What changed

A new creative direction marked a clear rebrand-by-era.

Creative leadership shift

  • Concept-driven runway shows

  • Campaigns that felt bold, strange and current

  • Denim treated as experimental and high-fashion


Updated visual language

  • Editorial, high-energy imagery

  • A modern take on sexiness and youth culture


Product repositioning

  • Reimagined denim cuts and treatments

  • Accessories and ready-to-wear designed for visibility

  • Renewed presence in fashion media and influencer culture

The name stayed. The era changed.



After the rebrand: what actually changed

  • Under creative director Glenn Martens (appointed in 2020), Diesel has been explicitly repositioned as an “alternative luxury” player, with sustainable denim and a bigger push on accessories and fragrance.

  • The brand has staged what press are openly calling a comeback: Diesel’s high-impact Milan shows and provocative denim (ultra-low rises, experimental cuts) have reinserted it into the fashion conversation.

  • Crucially, the rebrand has landed with younger customers: Gen Z (16–25) now accounts for about 36% of Diesel’s sales, according to recent coverage – a big deal for a label that had been seen as “your older cousin’s denim brand” a few years prior.

It’s hard to find clean public revenue splits for Diesel alone, but industry reporting is consistent: the Martens era has shifted Diesel from fading mass-market denim to a brand Gen Z actually cares about again.



What These Rebrand Examples Have in Common

Across Crocs, SKIMS and Diesel:

  1. The old brand no longer fit

    • Crocs: stuck as a joke

    • SKIMS: wrong name and narrative

    • Diesel: outdated relevance


  2. They changed more than visuals

    • Positioning, story and meaning

    • Creative direction and culture

    • Who the brand is really for


  3. They redefined perception

    • Utility → cult

    • Controversy → credibility

    • Nostalgia → relevance

A true rebrand is a strategic reset — not a cosmetic one.



When You’re in Rebrand Territory (Not Just Refresh)

You’re likely ready for a rebrand if:

  • Your audience, market or region has changed

  • Your pricing and quality have grown, but the brand hasn’t

  • Your name or story is holding you back

  • People consistently misunderstand what you do

  • Your internal reality no longer matches what the outside world sees


That’s when tweaks aren’t enough.


You need to rethink:

  • Positioning

  • Story and language

  • Identity and creative direction

  • Website, content and campaign rollout


Where We Come In


At The Stylatude, we work with brands who are:

  • Too established for DIY branding

  • Too evolved for their current name, look or story

  • Ready to step into a new phase of growth


Our Brand Glow-Up / Rebrand work helps you decide whether you need:

  • A strategic refresh, or

  • A true rebrand like the examples above


Then we build:

  • Brand strategy and positioning

  • Visual identity and creative direction

  • Website experience and launch-ready content


So the brand people see finally matches the brand you’ve become.

Comments


bottom of page